This is not a new argument but one that has divided nations for decades, on several occasions smallpox has been on the agenda of the World Health Association (WHA) meetings, the last time that this issue was discussed was May 2011. The meeting was again to discuss whether the stocks of smallpox should be kept or destroyed, no decision was made. The WHA decided that the subject would be reassessed in 2014 ‘The decision followed contentious discussions on a draft resolution, proposed by the US and several co-sponsors, that would have allowed continued retention of the existing virus stocks, with a report on progress of research only in five years time (2016), at the 69th WHA. Despite an informal working group meeting to deliberate the issue, there was no consensus and a decision was then made to defer the discussion on the draft resolution’
In order to make a decision as to
whether or not I believe the smallpox virus should be destroyed I have read the
following:
The report from the 65th
WHA meeting outlining the decision to defer the subject for a further five
years, CHING,L.L.2011. Attempts by the
United States to prolong the retention of variola (smallpox) virus stocks have
been thwarted at the World Health Assembly (WHA).Proceedings of the 65th
WHA Meeting. 16-24 May 2011.Geneva.
I have read online articles from
science insider, MARTIN,E.2011 .After U.S
pressure, smallpox wins reprieve again. [online] Cambridge. Science Insider. Available from: http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2011/05/smallpox-virus-wins-three-year.html
[Accessed 11th April 2013]
An article at www.nature.com discussed reasons why the virus
should be kept. NATURE INTRNATIONAL WEEKLY SCIENCE JOURNAL.2011.Smallpox should be saved.
Nature.469.265. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v469/n7330/full/469265a.html
[Accessed 11th April 2013]
Kathleen Sebelius who is the U.S secretary
of health and human services also discussed reason to keep the stocks in an
article in the New York Times. SEBELIUS,K. 2011.Why We Still Need Smallpox. [online] New York. New York Times.
Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/26/opinion/26iht-edsebelius26.html?_r=0
[Accessed 11th April 2013]
The book Deadly Diseases and
Epidemics, Smallpox proved very helpful as it discussed both sides of the
argument. Finer,K,R.2004.Deadly Diseases
and Epidemics:Smallpox.USA. Chelsea House Publications.
I did find whilst researching the
subject that there seems to be an abundance of information discussing reasons why
the virus should be kept as opposed to much less people supporting the
destruction of the stocks. In the following posts I will outline the reasons
for retaining the stocks and for destroying them.